I thought the pitch event was very successful all in all.

I like the concept that I can read several short pitches without having to give feedback directly to everyone. I can approach the authors I'm interested in and easily get into an exchange.

All of the projects that I requested were released to me very quickly, and the authors also always responded to queries quite quickly - I found that very pleasant. The same applies to the technical side: I understood everything well and found my way around the website very well.

With this in mind, I'm already looking forward to the pitch event in January.

I think the Scriptdock platform is important for us as producers, as it allows offers professionally prepared material that represents a wide variety of genres, perspectives and programs. You can get in touch with authors whose work is already convincing on a pitch basis at a low threshold and thus approach people in a more targeted way. Thus the often noncommittal first meetings lead directly to a concrete exchange about the ideas and, from my point of view, are also perceived as more productive in the further course.

From an authors perspective, I find the platform beneficial because the material is developed, mirrored and discussed together, which results in a selection process that also helps potential partners to make decisions. Any gaps in development can be closed before the material is made available, which also helps the first impression and review by producers and increases the chances of success.

The training of authors is a key point for me in developing professional concepts here that are tailored to the industry and are therefore more convincing at the formal level alone.